Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (3):581-595 (2017)

Philosophers disagree about what precisely makes an act paternalistic, and about whether, when, and why paternalistic acts are morally objectionable. Despite these disagreements, it might seem uncontroversial to think that it is permissible to paternalize children. When paternalism seems morally objectionable, that is usually because an adult has been treated in a way that seems appropriate only for children. But, we might think, there can be nothing morally objectionable about treating children as children. In this paper, however, I argue that there are limits to how we may permissibly paternalize children. I begin in Section 1 by describing and endorsing Jonathan Quong’s account of paternalism, which defines paternalistic acts as those that involve particular kinds of judgments that the paternalizer makes about the capacities of the paternalizee. In Section 2, I identify a distinction between two kinds of paternalism: ‘compensatory’ paternalism, and ‘non-compensatory’ paternalism. In Section 3, I argue that compensatory paternalism is usually permissible in the case of children. In section 4, I argue that non-compensatory paternalism is much harder to justify than compensatory paternalism, and because of this, it is sometimes impermissible even when directed at children.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-017-9804-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
The morality of freedom.J. Raz - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (1):108-109.
Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Medical Paternalism.Paula Boddington & Heta Hayry - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (171):263.
Children, Paternalism and the Development of Autonomy.Amy Mullin - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):413-426.
The Problems of Paternalism.George John Miller - 1981 - Dissertation, Brown University
Public Bioethics.Jessica Flanigan - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (2):170-184.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #455,955 of 2,507,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #276,895 of 2,507,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes