Svätopluk Štúr’s criticism of Nietzsche’s vitalism

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 13 (1-2):105-114 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Svätopluk Štúr is a strong critic of strands of German thought that emphasize the will to power as an organizing principle of human society. Štúr is particularly critical of Nietzsche’s vitalism, which Štúr believes culminated in national socialism and the destruction of the Second World War. This paper describes and examines Štúr’s criticism of a number of German thinkers and focuses especially on Štúr’s criticism of Nietzsche. Štúr criticizes Nietzsche’s emphasis on life over knowledge. Štúr offers a different philosophy of life grounded in the dignity of human beings and the social consequences of ideas and actions. This paper concludes by examining what Štúr means by dignity in terms of a moral agent and as opposed to Nietzsche’s emphasis on vitalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-28

Downloads
17 (#213,731)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vitalism as Pathos.Thomas Osborne - 2016 - Biosemiotics 9 (2):185-205.
Nature of dignity and human dignity.Vasil Gluchman - 2017 - Human Affairs 27 (2):131-144.
Nietzsche and/or/versus Darwin.Babette Babich - 2014 - Common Knowledge 20 (3):404-411.
Darwin and Nietzsche: Selection, Evolution, and Morality.Catherine Wilson - 2013 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (2):354-370.

View all 7 references / Add more references