Rape as a Hate Crime: An Analysis of New York Law

Hypatia 31 (1):91-106 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

New York defines rape as forced penile vaginal penetration, which means only women can be rape victims. Given this definition, rape should always be considered a type of hate crime and thus eligible for sentencing enhancement because the perpetrators target victims based on their group membership. Such a narrow definition of rape is problematic because it fails to acknowledge oral and anal rape and overlooks the fact that men can also be raped. I argue that regardless of the type of sexual assault that occurs, rape should be considered a hate crime when the rapist chooses the victim based on gender, gender identity, and/or sexual orientation and the rape reinforces the patriarchal and heteronormative hegemony

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-05

Downloads
60 (#284,067)

6 months
7 (#961,953)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Feminist philosophy of law.Leslie Francis - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Feminist philosophy of law.Patricia Smith - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rethinking Rape.Ann J. Cahill - 2001 - Cornell University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references