Ethical Considerations When Using Mobile Technology in the Pre-Service Teacher Practicum

International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 2 (2):1-11 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, the authors revisit the pre-service teacher practicum experience and propose that mobile technology, with its ability to provide instant communication and immediate access to resources, could minimise the “disconnect” between theory and the school classroom and improve the experience for all parties involved. However, before this project began, the wide-ranging ethical considerations surrounding the use of mobile technologies had to be addressed. This paper outlines a range of issues that should be considered whenever mobile technologies are to be employed when researching in schools.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The portable panopticon: morality and mobile technologies.Martin De Saulles & David S. Horner - 2011 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 9 (3):206-216.
Mobile Devices and Recording in the Classroom.Yasmin Ibrahim & Anita Howarth - 2014 - International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 3 (1):21-32.
Digital Media Ethics: Benefits and Challenges in School Education.Torbjörn Ott & Marco Tiozzo - 2022 - International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 2 (14).

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
21 (#729,395)

6 months
9 (#436,380)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Technology and Ethics: Privacy in the Workplace.Laura P. Hartman - 2001 - Business and Society Review 106 (1):1-27.
Mobile communication and ethics: implications of everyday actions on social order.Rich Ling & Rhonda McEwen - 2010 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (2):11-26.

Add more references