14 found
Order:
See also
Marco Tiozzo
University of Gothenburg
  1. Matters of Ambiguity: Faultless Disagreement, Relativism and Realism.John Eriksson & Marco Tiozzo - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1517-1536.
    In some cases of disagreement it seems that neither party is at fault or making a mistake. This phenomenon, so-called faultless disagreement, has recently been invoked as a key motivation for relativist treatments of domains prone to such disagreements. The conceivability of faultless disagreement therefore appears incompatible with traditional realists semantics. This paper examines recent attempts to accommodate faultless disagreement without giving up on realism. We argue that the accommodation is unsatisfactory. However, the examination highlights that “faultless” is multiply ambiguous. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2.  87
    Moral Peer Disagreement and the Limits of Higher-Order Evidence.Marco Tiozzo - 2020 - In Michael Klenk (ed.), Higher-Order Evidence and Moral Epistemology. Routledge.
    Abstract. This paper argues that the “Argument from Moral Peer Disagreement” fails to make a case for widespread moral skepticism. The main reason for this is that the argument rests on a too strong assumption about the normative significance of peer disagreement (and higher-order evidence more generally). In order to demonstrate this, I distinguish two competing ways in which one might explain higher-order defeat. According to what I call the “Objective Defeat Explanation” it is the mere possession of higher-order evidence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3. Explaining Higher-Order Defeat.Marco Tiozzo - forthcoming - Acta Analytica:1-17.
    Higher-order evidence appears to have the ability to defeat rational belief. It is not obvious, however, why exactly the defeat happens. In this paper, I consider two competing explanations of higher-order defeat: the “Objective Higher-Order Defeat Explanation” and the “Subjective Higher-Order Defat Explanation.” According to the former explanation, possessing sufciently strong higher-order evidence to indicate that one’s belief about p fails to be rational is necessary and sufcient for defeating one’s belief about p. I argue that this type of explanation (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  55
    The Level-Splitting View and the Non-Akrasia Constraint.Marco Tiozzo - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (3):917-923.
    Some philosophers have defended the idea that in cases of all-things-considered misleading higher-order evidence it is rational to take divergent doxastic attitudes to p and E supports p. In a recent paper, Sophie Horowitz has argued that such “Level-Splitting views” are implausible since they violate a rational requirement she calls the Non-Akrasia Constraint. In this paper, I argue that Horowitz’s objection is misguided since it conflates two distinct notions of epistemic rationality.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  32
    Om Charles Ess Digital Media Ethics. [REVIEW]Marco Tiozzo & Torbjörn Ott - 2021 - Tidskrift För Politisk Filosofi 25:86-91.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  13
    Om moralisk oenighet mellan epistemiska likar.Marco Tiozzo - 2016 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 37 (2):24-34.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  22
    Richard Rowland: Moral Disagreement: New York, Routledge, 2021, Hardback (ISBN 978-1-138-58984-1). 258 Pp. [REVIEW]Marco Tiozzo - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (4):1053-1055.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  39
    Om fiktion och verklighet.Marco Tiozzo - 2011 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 32 (1):18-30.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  28
    Om betydelsen av evidens av högre ordning.Marco Tiozzo - 2019 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 39 (1).
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  23
    Kan böcker vara moraliska eller omoraliska?Marco Tiozzo - 2011 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 32 (4).
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  14
    Nätetik: perspektiv och utmaningar för skolan.Marco Tiozzo - 2019 - Pedagogiska Magasinet 4.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  11
    Moral Judgments, Cognitivism and the Dispositional Nature of Belief: Why Moral Peer Intransigence is Intelligible.John Eriksson & Marco Tiozzo - 2021 - Philosophia 49 (4):1753-1766.
    Richard Rowland has recently argued that considerations based on moral disagreement between epistemic peers give us reason to think that cognitivism about moral judgments, i.e., the thesis that moral judgments are beliefs, is false. The novelty of Rowland’s argument is to tweak the problem descriptively, i.e., not focusing on what one ought to do, but on what disputants actually do in the light of peer disagreement. The basic idea is that moral peer disagreement is intelligible. However, if moral judgments were (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Digital Media Ethics: Benefits and Challenges in School Education.Torbjörn Ott & Marco Tiozzo - 2022 - International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 2 (14).
    Digital media and connected technologies have brought about some new ethical challenges to the surface. Digital media ethics is the scientific and systematic study of ethical attitudes and problems in relation to the use of digital media. This paper discusses the role of digital media ethics in modern school education. First, it is argued that digital media ethics is best perceived as a dimension of digital competence more generally. Since the development of students’ digital competence is one of the central (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Om kunskapsteori: En introduktion till vetande, berättigande och sanning av Lars-Göran Johansson, Tomas Ekenberg, George Masterton och Pauliina Remes. [REVIEW]Marco Tiozzo - 2021 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 41 (1).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark