The Unknown Socrates: Translations, with Introductions and Notes, of Four Important Documents in the Late Antique Reception of Socrates the Athenian

Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Socrates (469-399 BC) is one of history's most enigmatic figures. Our knowledge of him comes to us second-hand, primarily from the philosopher Plato, who was Socrates' most gifted student, and from the historian and sometime-philosopher Xenophon, who counted himself as a member of Socrates' inner circle of friends. We also hear of Socrates in one comic play produced during his lifetime (Aristophanes' Clouds) and in passing from the philosopher Aristotle, a student of Plato. Socrates is a figure of enduring interest. He is often considered the father of Western Philosophy, yet the four most famous accounts we have of him present a contradictory, confusing picture. Just who was Socrates? A brilliant philosopher, at times confounding and infuriating, morally serious and yet ironic; the ever-worldly man, sometime mystic, and uncommon martyr depicted by Plato? Or did Plato conflate Socrates' views with his own startling genius, as Aristotle suggests? Was So rates instead the less impressive, more mundane man whose commonsense impressed the laconic Xenophon? Or was Socrates the charlatan, the long-winded phony of Aristophanes' play? The Socratic works of Diogenes Laertius (3rd century AD), Libanius (AD 314 -- c. 393), Maximus of 'Tyre (2nd century AD), and Apuleius (born c. AD 125) add important dimensions to the portrait of Socrates: Diogenes Laertius' Life of Socrates emphasizes Socrates' deep ethical nature and his extraordinary personality; Libanius' Apology of Socrates is based on sources now lost to us; Maximus of Tyre's Whether Socrates Did the Right Thing When He Did Not Defend Himself makes the star ling claim (against testimony of Plato and Xenophon) that Socrates never spoke athis own trial; from Apuleius' On the God of Socrates we hear at length of Socrates' infamous daimonion: the "divine sign" only mentioned elsewhere, the sign that warned Socrates against certain courses of action. In short, from these four texts we are reintroduced to Socrates, and new wrinkles are added to an already intriguing historical figure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sokrat üç filosofun təqdimatinda. Malikov - 2023 - Amea Sosial Elmlər Jurnalı (1):208-214.
Who was Socrates?Cornelia De Vogel - 1963 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 (2):143-161.
Socrates.Donald R. Morrison - 2018 - In Sean D. Kirkland & Eric Sanday (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. pp. 99–118.
Socrates in love: the making of a philosopher.Armand D'Angour - 2019 - New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Rationalizing Socrates’ daimonion.Bridger Ehli - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2):225-240.
The Socratic Turn.C. Zuckert - 2004 - History of Political Thought 25 (2):189-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
7 (#1,407,052)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

O Sócrates de Xonofonte.Ana Elias Pinheiro - 2008 - Humanitas 60:101-114.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references