Renegotiating Aquinas

Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (2):193-217 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While Roman Catholic feminist ethicists typically endorse moral realism and crosscultural standards of justice, they also have been influenced by the postmodern interrogation of abstract reason and moral universalism. As theologians writing after the Second Vatican Council, they are increasingly sensitive to the communal and ecclesial dimensions of morality and of Christian ethics, and to the integral relation of Christian faith and ethics. This essay will consider two approaches to Catholic feminist ethics that differ in the relative weight they give to constructive work for social justice, or to the grounding of ethics in prayer and mysticism. Using critical feminist reappropriations of the theology and ethics of Aquinas as examples, this essay will argue that the two approaches are overlapping and interdependent

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-24

Downloads
52 (#331,433)

6 months
12 (#449,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ethnography and Jewish Ethics.Michal S. Raucher - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (4):636-658.
Feminist Ethics and Religious Ethics.Margaret Mohrmann - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (2):185-192.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1988 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):363-363.
Non‐Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach.Martha Craven Nussbaum - 1988 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):32-53.

View all 27 references / Add more references