Women in Philosophy: What is to be Done? Interrogating the Values of Representation and Intersectionality

European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 19 (1):6-28 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is clear that philosophy has a “woman problem”. Despite the recent acceptance of this fact, it is less clear what ought to be done about it. In this paper, we argue that philosophy as a discipline is uniquely well-positioned to think through the marginalisation suffered by women and other minorities. We therefore interrogate two values that already undergird conversations about inclusion— representation and intersectionality—in order to think about the path ahead. We argue that, once we have done so, it becomes clear that the slow pace of improvement over the last few decades is unacceptable and more radical steps need to be taken. First, we outline the current state of women in philosophy focusing on three areas: levels of employment, publishing, and sexual harassment. Then we turn to representation and intersectionality respectively. We conclude by arguing that many women and people of colour have been arguing for a more radically diverse philosophy for many years. What we are facing is a lack of ambition on the one hand and problem of attention on the other.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re-thinking Intersectionality.Jennifer C. Nash - 2008 - Feminist Review 89 (1):1-15.
On Intersectionality, Empathy, And Feminist Solidarity: A Reply To Naomi Zack.Alison Bailey - 2009 - Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 19 (1):14-36.
Intersectionality and the Changing Face of Ecofeminism.A. E. Kings - 2017 - Ethics and the Environment 22 (1):63-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-08

Downloads
46 (#345,756)

6 months
20 (#130,427)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?