Why elementary propositions cannot be negative

Philosophical Studies 27 (6):433 - 435 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01236463

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions.Emil L. Post - 1921 - American Journal of Mathematics 43 (3):163--185.
Elementary Propositions and Independence.John L. Bell & William Demopoulos - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (1):112-124.
The Tractatus on Logical Consequence.José L. Zalabardo - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
Elementary Prepositions, Independence, and Pictures.Rod Bertolet - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:53-61.
Wittgenstein's logical atomism.Ian Proops - 2004 - Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (65):374-376.
Proper Names, Contingency A Priori and Necessity A Posteriori.Chen Bo - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (2):119 - 138.
How to Be a Truthmaker Maximalist.Ross P. Cameron - 2008 - Noûs 42 (3):410 - 421.
Bare particulars, names, and elementary propositions.L. E. Palmieri - 1960 - Synthese 12 (1):71 - 78.
Showing, analysis and the truth-functionality of logical necessity in Wittgenstein's tractatus.Leo K. C. Cheung - 2004 - Synthese 139 (1):81 - 105.
Negative elementary propositions.Robert J. Fogelin - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (3):189 - 197.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#865,183)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references