Polygenic scores for social science: Clarification, consensus, and controversy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e232 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this response, I focus on clarifying my arguments, highlighting consensus, and addressing competing views about the utility of polygenic scores (PGSs) for social science. I also discuss an assortment of expansions to my arguments and suggest alternative approaches. I conclude by reiterating the need for caution and appropriate scientific skepticism.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x23000845

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Often wrong, sometimes useful: Including polygenic scores in social science research.Jason Fletcher - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e213.
Tractable limitations of current polygenic scores do not excuse genetically confounded social science.Damien Morris, Stuart J. Ritchie & Alexander I. Young - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e222.
Polygenic scores and social science.Walter Veit & Heather Browning - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e229.
Social scientists would do well to steer clear of polygenic scores.David Curtis - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e212.
Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science: Environmental confounding, downward causation, and unknown biology.Callie H. Burt - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e207.
Polygenic scores ignore development and epigenetics, dramatically reducing their value.David S. Moore - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e220.
Polygenic risk scores cannot make their mark on psychiatry without considering epigenetics.Diane C. Gooding & Anthony P. Auger - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e216.
Bioethicists Are Not so Divided on Reproductive Testing for Non-Medical Traits: Emerging Perspectives on Polygenic Scores.Kalina Kamenova & Hazar Haidar - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3):48-50.
Burt uses a fallacious motte-and-bailey argument to dispute the value of genetics for social science.Brendan P. Zietsch, Abdel Abdellaoui & Karin J. H. Verweij - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e231.
Potential use of clinical polygenic risk scores in psychiatry – ethical implications and communicating high polygenic risk.A. C. Palk, S. Dalvie, J. de Vries, A. R. Martin & D. J. Stein - 2019 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 14 (1):1-12.
Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction.Sarah Munday & Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e91-e91.
Misguided model of human behavior: Comment on C. H. Burt: “Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science…”.Ken Richardson - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e225.
Polygenic scores, and the genome-wide association studies they derive from, will have difficulty identifying genes that predispose one to develop a social behavioral trait.Edward Fox - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e214.
GWASs and polygenic scores inherit all the old problems of heritability estimates.Sahotra Sarkar - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e227.
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-12

Downloads
4 (#1,617,429)

6 months
2 (#1,193,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Callie Burt
Georgia State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Vacuity of Postmodernist Methodology.Nicholas Shackel - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):295-320.

View all 11 references / Add more references