Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):211-234 (2010)
AbstractThis paper defends Heidegger's account of resolute self-choice against the ubiquitous Decisionism Critique [DC]. According to DC, Heidegger's discussion of resoluteness commits him to an indefensible position in which resolute Dasein is said to choose who it will be without recourse to any reasons or evaluative standards. In response, I argue that DC is based on a misunderstanding of some of the key arguments of Being and Time . I then offer an alternative portrait of Heidegger's account of resolute self-choice and argue that such choice will involve both 1) the consideration of factical claims as reasons that count in favor of a particular way of life and 2) the evaluation of these reasons in light of at least three deliberative standards. Thus, I argue that DC is misguided and needs to be replaced by an interpretation rooted in a more complete understanding of Heidegger's project
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.
Temporal Finitude and Finitude of Possibility: The Double Meaning of Death in Being and Time.Havi Carel - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (4):541 – 556.
The Heidegger-Buber Controversy: The Status of the I-Thou.Ḥayim Gordon - 2001 - Greenwood Press.
Intersubjectivity and Death: Heidegger and the Iroquois.Brian Seitz - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):45-62.
Why Tugendhat's Critique of Heidegger's Concept of Truth Remains a Critical Problem.William H. Smith - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):156 – 179.
Towards the Origin of Modern Technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger’s Thinking. [REVIEW]Søren Riis - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):103-117.
Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl.Søren Overgaard - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
References found in this work
Citations of this work
Phenomenological method and contemporary ethics.John J. Drummond - 2021 - Continental Philosophy Review 54 (2):123-138.
Objectivity and Reflection in Heidegger’s Theory of Intentionality.Tucker Mckinney - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (1):111--130.