Review of John P. Burgess and Gideon Rosen: A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):161-167 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 30 (3):231-259.
BURGESS, JP and ROSEN, G.-A Subject with No Object.M. Detlefsen - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (3):153-162.
Review of J P Burgess and G Rosen A Subject With No Objects. [REVIEW]M. Colyvan - 2001 - Studia Logica 67 (No 1, February 2001):146-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
11 (#1,147,580)

6 months
4 (#1,005,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Indexing and Mathematical Explanation.Alan Baker & Mark Colyvan - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):323-334.
Mathematics and bleak house.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophia Mathematica 12 (1):18-36.
Epistemological objections to platonism.David Liggins - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):67-77.
Is Cantor's continuum problem inherently vague?Kai Hauser - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):257-285.
Labyrinth of Continua.Patrick Reeder - 2018 - Philosophia Mathematica 26 (1):1-39.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references