Labyrinth of Continua

Philosophia Mathematica 26 (1):1-39 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This is a survey of the concept of continuity. Efforts to explicate continuity have produced a plurality of philosophical conceptions of continuity that have provably distinct expressions within contemporary mathematics. I claim that there is a divide between the conceptions that treat the whole continuum as prior to its parts, and those conceptions that treat the parts of the continuum as prior to the whole. Along this divide, a tension emerges between those conceptions that favor philosophical idealizations of continuity and those that are more readily available for mathematico-scientific use.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Boundaries as Dependent Particulars.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1983 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 20 (1):87-95.
Beiträge zur Philosophie von Stephan Körner.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1983 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 20:87-95.
Peirce's Topical Continuum: A “Thicker” Theory.Jon Alan Schmidt - 2020 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56 (1):62-80.
The Ancient versus the Modern Continuum.Eduardo Noble & Max Fernández de Castro - 2017 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):1343-1380.
Revolution and Continuity. [REVIEW]Anita L. Kronsberg - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):124-125.
Matter, Unity and Infinity in Early Leibniz.Samuel Stephen Levey - 1997 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
‘Concepts’ and Continuity: Onto-Epistemology in William James.Russell J. Duvernoy - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (Winter 2015, (4)):508-30..


Added to PP

88 (#191,557)

6 months
13 (#282,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Reeder
Kenyon College

Citations of this work

Quick and Easy Recipes for Hypergunk.Patrick Reeder - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (1):178-191.
McLaughlin-Millerの運動モデルの位相的側面.Takuma Imamura - 2022 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 50 (1):47-72.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On what grounds what.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In Ryan Wasserman, David Manley & David Chalmers (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical grounding: understanding the structure of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. qnew York: Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.
Parts: a study in ontology.Peter M. Simons - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 141 references / Add more references