Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):409-424 (2016)
AbstractMedical practitioners are duty-bound to tell their patients the truth about their medical conditions, along with the risks and benefits of proposed treatments. Some patients, however, would rather not receive medical information. A recent response to this tension has been to argue that that the disclosure of medical information is not optional. As such, patients do not have permission to refuse medical information. In this paper I argue that, depending on the context, the disclosure of medical information can undermine the patient’s ability to exercise her autonomy or have therapeutically detrimental effects. In the light of these insights I go on to develop a context-sensitive approach to medical disclosure. The advantage of this account is that it addresses concerns on both sides of the debate; whilst it acknowledges that patients do not have an exercisable ‘right not to know,’ it allows that in some cases medical information ought to be withheld.
Similar books and articles
A Defence of Medical Paternalism: Maximising Patients' Autonomy.M. S. Komrad - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (1):38-44.
Argumentation and Informed Consent in the Doctor–Patient Relationship.Jerome Bickenbach - 2012 - Journal of Argumentaion in Context 1 (1):5-18.
Autonomy and Negatively Informed Consent.Ulrik Kihlbom - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):146-9.
Disclosure: The Hidden Weakness in Informed Consent.David Allan Brokken - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Medical Responsibility: Paternalism, Informed Consent, and Euthanasia.Wade L. Robison & Michael S. Pritchard - 1979 - Humana PressInc.
“There is No Evidence to Suggest …”: Changing The Way We Judge Information For Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process.Leslie Cannold - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184.
Patient Autonomy and Medical Paternity: Can Nurses Help Doctors to Listen to Patients?Sarah Breier-Mackie - 2001 - Nursing Ethics 8 (6):510-521.
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Commentary 1: CPR and the Cost of Autonomy.Robin Gill - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):317-318.
Changes in Attitudes Regarding Cancer Disclosure Among Medical Students at the American University of Beirut.Ghassan N. Hamadeh & Salim M. Adib - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):354-354.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Right Not to Know and the Obligation to Know.Ben Davies - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (5):300-303.
Knowing and Not‐Knowing For Your Own Good: The Limits of Epistemic Paternalism.Emma C. Bullock - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy:433-447.
Epistemic Paternalism, Epistemic Permissivism, and Standpoint Epistemology.Elizabeth Jackson - 2020 - In Amiel Bernal & Guy Axtell (eds.), Epistemic Paternalism Reconsidered: Conceptions, Justifications, and Implications. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 201-215.
What’s Epistemic About Epistemic Paternalism?Elizabeth Jackson - 2022 - In Jonathan Matheson & Kirk Lougheed (eds.), Epistemic Autonomy. New York: Routledge. pp. 132–150.
The Right Not to Know: Some Steps Towards a Compromise.Ben Davies & Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):137-150.
References found in this work
Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (3):205-250.