- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Judging the Past: The Case of the Human Radiation Experiments
Hastings Center Report 26 (3):25-30 (1996)
Abstract
Our reluctance to measure the morality of past practices is more than a nagging problem for moral theorists. The legitimacy of retrospective moral judgment has fundamental implications for how practices and institutions should be viewed, and judged, now.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Charles Weijer - unknown
Looking back and judging our predecessors.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):251-270.
Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.Ruth Macklin - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311.
Using a thought experiment to clarify a radiobiological controversy.Kristan Shrader-Frechete - 2001 - Synthese 128 (3):319 - 342.
The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments: Reflections on a Presidential Commission.Ruth Faden - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (5):5-10.
Chair's perspective on the work of the advisory committee on human radiation experiments.Ruth R. Faden - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):215-221.
Gravitational radiation reaction on the motion of particles in general relativity.P. A. Hogan & I. Robinson - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (5):455-464.
Finetuning NLG through experiments with human subjects: The case of vague descriptions.Kees van Deemter - unknown
Are Research Subjects Adequately Protected? A Review and Discussion of Studies Conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Jeremy Sugarman & Nancy E. Kass - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):271-282.
Mice and the Reactor: The “Genetics Experiment” in 1950s Britain. [REVIEW]Soraya de Chadarevian - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (4):707-735.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
22 (#709,216)
6 months
5 (#639,460)
2013-11-22
Downloads
22 (#709,216)
6 months
5 (#639,460)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Case for the Moral Permissibility of Amnesties: An Argument from Social Moral Epistemology.Juan Espindola - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):971-985.
The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research.Bryan Benham - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (3):147–156.
Structural Injustice and Ethical Consumption.Mark Peacock - 2023 - The Journal of Ethics 27 (2):191-210.
Unit 731 and moral repair.Doug Hickey, Scarllet SiJia Li, Celia Morrison, Richard Schulz, Michelle Thiry & Kelly Sorensen - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (4):270-276.
Connecting Past with Present: A Mixed-Methods Science Ethics Course and its Evaluation.Ioanna Semendeferi, Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis, Malcolm Dcosta & Ioannis Pavlidis - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):251-274.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo