3. Wittgensteins „propaganda for a descriptive method, instead of an explanatory.“ Die Vorlesung im May Term 1933

In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 274-304 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783110366112.274

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Radical explanations, but trivial descriptions.Claus Lamm - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):842-843.
Die Probleme der Philosophie in ihrem Zusammenhang: Vorlesung aus dem Wintersemester 1933/34.Moritz Schlick - 1986 - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Edited by Henk L. Mulder, Anne J. Kox & Rainer Hegselmann.
Propaganda and Art: A Philosophical Analysis.Sheryl Tuttle Ross - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
German propaganda instructions of 1933.Ernst Kris - forthcoming - Social Research: An International Quarterly.
The Concept of Reinforcement: Explanatory or Descriptive?François Tonneau - 2008 - Behavior and Philosophy 36:87 - 96.
Augenblick des Geistes. Heideggers Vorlesung „Die Gmndfrage der Philosophie" von 1933.Andreas Großmann - 1993 - Perspektiven der Philosophie 19:195-212.
Understanding Propaganda: The Epistemic Merit Model and Its Application to Art.Sheryl Tuttle Ross - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 36 (1):16-30.
Harmonizing Hermeneutics: The Normative and Descriptive Approaches, Interpretation and Criticism.William T. Irwin - 1996 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
What Sort of Statement Is “/p/is a phoneme of English”?Paul Rastall - 2010 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 17 (2):143-149.
Vorlesung über Negative Dialektik: Fragmente zur Vorlesung 1965/66.Theodor W. Adorno & Rolf Tiedemann - 2003 - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann.
Comparing Probabilistic Measures of Explanatory Power.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):813-829.
2. Wittgensteins erste Auseinandersetzung mit Frazers Golden Bough.Marco Brusotti - 2014 - In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 62-273.
The descriptive experience sampling method.Russell T. Hurlburt & Sarah A. Akhter - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):271-301.
Under What Conditions Can Formal Models of Social Action Claim Explanatory Power?Nathalie Bulle - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):47-64.
Anhang: Wittgensteins Auseinandersetzung mit Frazers Golden Bough im Kontext des Nachlasses.Marco Brusotti - 2014 - In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 398-405.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-28

Downloads
3 (#1,715,951)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Brusotti
Technische Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references