Weighing lives

New York: Oxford University Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We are often faced with choices that involve the weighing of people's lives against each other, or the weighing of lives against other good things. These are choices both for individuals and for societies. A person who is terminally ill may have to choose between palliative care and more aggressive treatment, which will give her a longer life but at some cost in suffering. We have to choose between the convenience to ourselves of road and air travel, and the lives of the future people who will be killed by the global warming we cause, through violent weather, tropical disease, and heat waves. We also make choices that affect how many lives there will be in the future: as individuals we choose how many children to have, and societies choose tax policies that influence people's choices about having children. These are all problems of weighing lives. How should we weigh lives? Weighing Lives develops a theoretical basis for answering this practical question. It extends the work and methods of Broome's earlier book Weighing Goods to cover the questions of life and death. Difficult problems come up in the process. In particular, Weighing Lives tackles the well-recognized, awkward problems of the ethics of population. It carefully examines the common intuition that adding people to the population is ethically neutral - neither a good nor a bad thing - but eventually concludes this intuition cannot be fitted into a coherent theory of value. In the course of its argument, Weighing Lives examines many of the issues of contemporary moral theory: the nature of consequentialism and teleology; the transitivity, continuity, and vagueness of betterness; the quantitative conception of wellbeing; the notion of a life worth living; the badness of death; and others. This is a work of philosophy, but one of its distinctive features is that it adopts some of the precise methods of economic theory (without introducing complex mathematics). Not only philosophers, but also economists and political theorists concerned with the practical question of valuing life, should find the book's conclusions highly significant to their work.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,319

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Weighing Lives.John Broome - 2004 - In Weighing lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Theory of Weighing Lives.John Broome - 2004 - In Weighing lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weighing Lives.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):718-722.
Weighing lives. [REVIEW]Tim Mulgan - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):363–368.
Weighing Lives in War.Finkelstein Claire, Larry Larry & Ohlin Jens David (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford University Press).
Review: Weighing Lives. [REVIEW]Tim Mulgan - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):363 - 368.
Impartiality in weighing lives.Richard Bradley - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (4):292-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
201 (#109,897)

6 months
23 (#160,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Broome
University Of Oxford

Citations of this work

Each Counts for One.Daniel Muñoz - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-18.
Totalism without Repugnance.Jacob M. Nebel - 2022 - In Jeff McMahan, Timothy Campbell, Ketan Ramakrishnan & Jimmy Goodrich (eds.), Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 200-231.

View all 214 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral Complications and Moral Structures.Robert Nozick - 1968 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 13 (1):1-50.

Add more references