The Standardized Total Principle

In Weighing lives. New York: Oxford University Press (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter derives the standardized total principle for valuing distributions that contain different numbers of people. It explains that this principle is total utilitarianism, when total utilitarianism is understood in the only way that makes good sense. It is also often called ‘critical-level utilitarianism’. It considers the neutral level for existence, then responds to some objections to total utilitarianism, in particular the repugnant conclusion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Value of a Life.John Broome - 2004 - In Weighing lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
The diminishing marginal value of happy people.James L. Hudson - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 51 (1):123 - 137.
The Reverse Repugnant Conclusion.Tim Mulgan - 2002 - Utilitas 14 (3):360.
Separability in Population Ethics.Teruji Thomas - 2022 - In Gustaf Arrhenius, Krister Bykvist, Tim Campbell & Elizabeth Finneron-Burns (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Population Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 271-295.
Broome on Moral Goodness and Population Ethics.Peter Vallentyne - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (3):739 - 746.
Prioritarianism and Population Ethics.Nils Holtug - 2012 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 25 (1):45-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
2 (#1,824,835)

6 months
2 (#1,448,208)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Broome
University Of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references