Engaging Experts: Science-Policy Interactions and the Introduction of Congestion Charging in Stockholm

Minerva 56 (2):183-207 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyzes the conditions for mobilizing the science base for development of public policy. It does so by focusing upon the science-policy interface, specifically the processes of direct interaction between scientists and scientifically trained experts, on the one hand, and agents of policymaking organizations, on the other. The article defines two dimensions – cognitive distance and expert autonomy – which are argued to influence knowledge exchange, in such a way as to shape the outcome. A case study on the implementation of congestion charges in Stockholm, Sweden, illustrates how the proposed framework pinpoints three central issues for understanding these processes: Differentiating the roles of, e.g., a science-based consultancy firm and an academic environment in policy formation; Examining the fit between the organizational form of the science-policy interface and the intended goals; and Increasing our understanding of when policymaker agents themselves need to develop scientific competence in order to interact effectively with scientific experts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science, Policy, Values: Exploring the Nexus.Heather E. Douglas - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):475-480.
Science, democracy, and public policy.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2):255-264.
The role of science in public policy: Higher reason, or reason for hire? [REVIEW]Stephen F. Haller & James Gerrie - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (2):139-165.
Scientific Consensus and Public Policy.Darrin W. Belousek - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 4:1-35.
A Kuhnian Crisis in Neo-Darwinism.Mark Frederick Earthey - 1987 - Dissertation, Aston University (United Kingdom)

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-31

Downloads
10 (#1,172,872)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?