Scientific information and uncertainty: Challenges for the use of science in policymaking

Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):437-455 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Science can reinforce the healthy aspects of the politics of the policy process, to identify and further the public interest by discrediting policy options serving only special interests and helping to select among “science-confident” and “hedging” options. To do so, scientists must learn how to manage and communicate the degree of uncertainty in scientific understanding and prediction, lest uncertainty be manipulated to discredit science or to justify inaction. For natural resource and environmental policy, the institutional interests of government agencies, as well as private interests, pose challenges of suppression, over-simplification, or distortion of scientific information. Scientists can combat these maneuvers, but must also look inward to ensure that their own special interests do not undermine the usefulness of science.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

83 (#145,089)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Essays in Positive Economics.Milton Friedman - 1953 - University of Chicago Press.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl R. Popper - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.

View all 8 references / Add more references