Lady Lovelace had it right: Computers originate nothing

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):532-533 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00035718

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Creativity, the Turing test, and the (better) Lovelace test.Selmer Bringsjord, P. Bello & David A. Ferrucci - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):3-27.
Turing’s Responses to Two Objections.Darren Abramson - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (2):147-167.
Why Computers are not Intelligent: An Argument.Richard Oxenberg - 2017 - Political Animal Magazine.
Philosophy of Mind, Cognitive Science, andPedagogical Technique.Marvin Croy - 2002 - Metaphilosophy 33 (1‐2):49-69.
The ontological status of computers or what is a computer?John Kelly - 1992 - AI and Society 6 (4):305-323.
Deciding arithmetic using SAD computers.Mark Hogarth - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):681-691.
Eksperymenty komputerowe w matematyce.Anna Lemańska - 1996 - Filozofia Nauki 3.
Computers Aren’t Syntax All the Way Down or Content All the Way Up.Cem Bozşahin - 2018 - Minds and Machines 28 (3):543-567.
Self-Recognition and Countermemory.Eric Steinhart - 1989 - Philosophy Today 33 (4):302-317.
Are we evolved computers?: A critical review of Steven Pinker's how the mind works. [REVIEW]Selmer Bringsjord - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):227 – 243.
Computers and computation in cognitive science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - In T.M. Michalewicz (ed.), Advances in Computational Life Sciences Vol.2: Humans to Proteins. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
Does Kripke’s Argument Against Functionalism Undermine the Standard View of What Computers Are?Jeff Buechner - 2018 - Minds and Machines 28 (3):491-513.
Ethical considerations concerning computers in medicine in the 1980s.F. T. de Dombal - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (4):179-184.
Why computers can't act.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1981 - American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (2):157-163.
Computers in developing nations.Camille Dickson-Deane - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (2):28-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-15

Downloads
25 (#627,632)

6 months
10 (#260,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Selmer Bringsjord
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Citations of this work

Creativity.Elliot Samuel Paul & Dustin Stokes - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Epiphenomenal qualia.Frank Jackson - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April):127-136.

View all 63 references / Add more references