Challenging Underlying Assumptions of Wrongful Birth

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (1):37-45 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of wrongful birth, which is based on the premise that a person would have been better off never having been born, is a serious mat­ter for Catholic obstetricians, especially in the context of prenatal screening. This principle, in conjuncture with the belief that individuals with disabilities have a decreased quality of life, has been used to promote a eugenic mentality. Consequently, prenatal screening tests often are used to identify fetuses with disabilities, who subsequently are aborted. Not only is this practice ethically reprehensible, but its presuppositions about quality of life find little support in the medical literature. In fact, in the case of Down syndrome, there is consider­able evidence to the contrary: individuals living with Down syndrome have a high quality of life and are accepted by their families. These data illuminate the discrepancy between how physicians portray Down syndrome to expect­ant parents and what the literature shows regarding this condition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wrongful Life and Wrongful Birth.Tracey Phelan - 2002 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 7 (4):10.
The uncomfortable truth about wrongful life cases.Hyunseop Kim - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):623-641.
What is wrong with 'wrongful life' cases?Barry M. Loewer - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):127-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-10

Downloads
11 (#1,164,628)

6 months
2 (#1,257,544)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references