Obstinacy in Suárez's Demonology

In Antonio Petagine & Valentin Braekman (eds.), Les anges dans la philosophie médiévale et moderne. Études offertes à Tiziana Suarez-Nani. Aracne. pp. 373-387 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I set out Suárez's conception of the demon's obstinacy. For Suárez, the demons’ obstinacy is a divine punishment. It is the result of the free and awful choice to turn away from God that the demons have decided to make, the main consequence of which is the loss of the freedom to will and to do the good. Taking up Aquinas’s conception, Suárez considers that the demonic nature is irredeemably corrupt and obstinate in evil. Demons are provided only with a miserable freedom, consisting of the possibility to choose between different evils. Perpetually sinful and eternally constrained to remain so, they are condemned to wretchedness, to complacency in evil, and to the unremitting torments of hell.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suárez, Francisco.Sydney Penner - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Evil Demons in the De Mysteriis: Assessing the Iamblichean Critique of Porphyry’s Demonology.Seamus O'Neill - 2018 - In Seamus O'Neill, Luc Brisson & Andrei Timotin (eds.), Neoplatonic Demons and Angels. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. pp. 160-189.
Natural Law in Aquinas and Suarez.Sean Coyle - 2017 - Jurisprudence 8 (2):319-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-21

Downloads
148 (#127,134)

6 months
83 (#56,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Valentin Braekman
University of Lausanne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references