Comments on Professor Card's Critique

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):31 - 37 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professor Card is not disposed to object to the main argument of my paper, which was intended to reply to Professor Lyons’ suggestion that a utilitarian cannot explain how legal rights have moral force, and at the same time to urge that the particular form of utilitarianism espoused by Professor Hare in his recent work does seem to be open to the difficulty Professor Lyons alleges. Professor Card says she is ‘not dissatisfied’ with this reasoning. I suspect that Card views my criticism of Professors Lyons and Hare as part of an in-house squabble among philosophers all of whom have utilitarian leanings of one sort or another; and she is not disposed to intervene in this. She does, however, have serious reservations about utilitarian views of rights in general, and about mine in particular; her paper consists almost entirely of her statement of these reservations. I find her remarks very welcome, since they express some objections which may be widely felt, and a response to which may therefore contribute to philosophers’ thinking about these issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Utility and the Basis of Moral Rights: A Reply to Professor Brandt.Claudia Card - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):21 - 30.
Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
Comments on professor Hartshorne's paper: Comments.Richard Rorty - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (21):606-608.
Some comments on professor Firth's reply.Richard Brandt - 1954 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (3):422-423.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Consequentialism, teleology, and the new friendship critique.By Robert F. Card - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):149–172.
Claudia card's.Maria Pia Lara - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (4):184-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
36 (#441,393)

6 months
10 (#262,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The concepts of obligation and duty.R. B. Brandt - 1964 - Mind 73 (291):374-393.
The concept of a moral right and its function.Richard B. Brandt - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):29-45.

Add more references