A Semantics for Hyperintensional Belief Revision Based on Information Bases

Studia Logica 110 (3):679-716 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I propose a novel hyperintensional semantics for belief revision and a corresponding system of dynamic doxastic logic. The main goal of the framework is to reduce some of the idealisations that are common in the belief revision literature and in dynamic epistemic logic. The models of the new framework are primarily based on potentially incomplete or inconsistent collections of information, represented by situations in a situation space. I propose that by shifting the representational focus of doxastic models from belief sets to collections of information, and by defining changes of beliefs as artifacts of changes of information, we can achieve a more realistic account of belief representation and belief change. The proposed dynamic operation suggests a non-classical way of changing beliefs: belief revision occurs in non-explosive environments which allow for a non-monotonic and hyperintensional belief dynamics. A logic that is sound with respect to the semantics is also provided.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Simple Hyperintensional Belief Revision.F. Berto - 2018 - Erkenntnis 84 (3):559-575.
Dynamic Hyperintensional Belief Revision.Aybüke Özgün & Francesco Berto - 2021 - Review of Symbolic Logic (3):766-811.
Belief revision in a temporal framework.Giacomo Bonanno - 2008 - In Krzysztof R. Apt & Robert Van Rooij (eds.), New Perspectives on Games and Interactions. Amsterdam University Press.
Revocable Belief Revision.Hans van Ditmarsch - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (6):1185-1214.
A formal model of multi-agent belief-interaction.John Cantwell - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):397-422.
A Formal Model of Multi-Agent Belief-Interaction.John Cantwell - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):303-329.
From onions to broccoli: generalizing Lewis' counterfactual logic.Patrick Girard - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):213-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-10

Downloads
61 (#257,413)

6 months
21 (#165,407)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sena Bozdag
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

Situations and attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating.Sven Ove Hansson - 1999 - Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dynamic Hyperintensional Belief Revision.Aybüke Özgün & Francesco Berto - 2021 - Review of Symbolic Logic (3):766-811.
Two modellings for theory change.Adam Grove - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (2):157-170.

View all 20 references / Add more references