More on grandmother cells and the biological implausibility of PDP models of cognition: A reply to Plaut and McClelland (2010) and Quian Quiroga and Kreiman (2010) [Book Review]

Psychological Review 117 (1):300-306 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/a0018047

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Postscript: About grandmother cells and Jennifer Aniston neurons.Rodrigo Quian Quiroga & Gabriel Kreiman - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):297-299.
Sparse but not ‘Grandmother-cell’ coding in the medial temporal lobe.R. Quian Quiroga, Gabriel Kreiman, Christof Koch & Itzhak Fried - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (3):87-91.
Measuring sparseness in the brain: Comment on Bowers (2009).Rodrigo Quian Quiroga & Gabriel Kreiman - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):291-297.
A Distributive Explanation of “Grandmother” Cells.Gonzalo Munevar - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 34:25-31.
Postscript: Some final thoughts on grandmother cells, distributed representations, and PDP models of cognition.Jeffrey Bowers - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):306-308.
Locating object knowledge in the brain: Comment on Bowers’s (2009) attempt to revive the grandmother cell hypothesis.David C. Plaut & James L. McClelland - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):284-288.
On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: Implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience.Jeffrey S. Bowers - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (1):220-251.
Postscript: Parallel distributed processing in localist models without thresholds.David C. Plaut & James L. McClelland - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (1):289-290.
A fundamental limitation of the conjunctive codes learned in PDP models of cognition: Comment on Botvinick and Plaut (2006).Jeffrey S. Bowers, Markus F. Damian & Colin J. Davis - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):986-995.
Perceptual and contextual awareness: methodological considerations in the search for the neural correlates of consciousness.Joaquin Navajas, Hernan G. Rey & Rodrigo Quian Quiroga - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition.James L. McClelland, Matthew M. Botvinick, David C. Noelle, David C. Plaut, Timothy T. Rogers, Mark S. Seidenberg & Linda B. Smith - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):348-356.
Letting Structure Emerge: Connectionist and Dynamical Systems Approaches to Cognition.Linda B. Smith James L. McClelland, Matthew M. Botvinick, David C. Noelle, David C. Plaut, Timothy T. Rogers, Mark S. Seidenberg - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):348.
Evaluating Artificial Models of Cognition.Marcin Miłkowski - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1):43-62.
Reading semantic cognition as a theory of concepts.Jesse Snedeker - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):727-728.
Lattice-gas cellular automaton models for biology: From fluids to cells.Dieter Wolf-Gladrow - 2010 - Acta Biotheoretica 58 (4):329-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references