13 found
Order:
  1. Norm Conflicts and Conditionals.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2019 - Psychological Review 126 (5):611-633.
    Suppose that two competing norms, N1 and N2, can be identified such that a given person’s response can be interpreted as correct according to N1 but incorrect according to N2. Which of these two norms, if any, should one use to interpret such a response? In this paper we seek to address this fundamental problem by studying individual variation in the interpretation of conditionals by establishing individual profiles of the participants based on their case judgments and reflective attitudes. To investigate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  2. Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Hannes Krahl & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):449-482.
    In this study we investigate the influence of reason-relation readings of indicative conditionals and ‘and’/‘but’/‘therefore’ sentences on various cognitive assessments. According to the Frege-Grice tradition, a dissociation is expected. Specifically, differences in the reason-relation reading of these sentences should affect participants’ evaluations of their acceptability but not of their truth value. In two experiments we tested this assumption by introducing a relevance manipulation into the truth-table task as well as in other tasks assessing the participants’ acceptability and probability evaluations. Across (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  3.  20
    How (in)variant are subjective representations of described and experienced risk and rewards?David Kellen, Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig - 2016 - Cognition 157 (C):126-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  23
    Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: Reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):164-173.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  5.  19
    Testing the foundations of signal detection theory in recognition memory.David Kellen, Samuel Winiger, John C. Dunn & Henrik Singmann - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (6):1022-1050.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  21
    Signal detection and threshold modeling of confidence-rating ROCs: A critical test with minimal assumptions.David Kellen & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (3):542-557.
  7.  28
    On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: The case of recognition memory.David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (3):457-479.
  8. Conditionals, Individual Variation, and the Scorekeeping Task.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Proceedings of Cognitive Science 39:xxx.
    In this manuscript we study individual variation in the interpretation of conditionals by establishing individual profiles of the participants based on their behavioral responses and reflective attitudes. To investigate the participants’ reflective attitudes we introduce a new experimental paradigm called the Scorekeeping Task, and a Bayesian mixture model tailored to analyze the data. The goal is thereby to identify the participants who follow the Suppositional Theory of conditionals and Inferentialism and to investigate their performance on the uncertain and-to-if inference task.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  13
    Against naïve induction from experimental data.David Kellen, Gregory E. Cox, Chris Donkin, John C. Dunn & Richard M. Shiffrin - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e51.
    This commentary argues against the indictment of current experimental practices such as piecemeal testing, and the proposed integrated experiment design (IED) approach, which we see as yet another attempt at automating scientific thinking. We identify a number of undesirable features of IED that lead us to believe that its broad application will hinder scientific progress.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  28
    On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: Reply to Benjamin (2013).David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann - 2013 - Psychological Review 120 (3):727-730.
  11.  12
    Normative accounts of illusory correlations.Franziska M. Bott, David Kellen & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (5):856-878.
  12.  14
    The law of categorical judgment (corrected) extended: A note on Rosner and Kochanski (2009).Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (1):216-220.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  21
    The repulsion effect in preferential choice and its relation to perceptual choice.Mikhail S. Spektor, David Kellen & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2022 - Cognition 225 (C):105164.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark