Critical thinking and the argumentational and epistemic virtues

Abstract

In this paper we argue that while a full-blown virtue-theoretical account of argumentation is implausible, there is scope for augmenting a conventional account of argument by taking a character-oriented turn. We then discuss the characteristics of the good epistemic citizen, and consider approaches to nurturing these characteristics in critical thinking students, in the hope of addressing the problem of lack of transfer of critical thinking skills to the world outside the classroom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
31 (#129,909)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nicomachean ethics. Aristotle - 1999 - New York: Clarendon Press. Edited by Michael Pakaluk. Translated by Michael Pakaluk.
The Sovereignty of Good.Iris Murdoch - 1971 - Philosophy 47 (180):178-180.
The Sovereignty of Good.Iris Murdoch - 1970 - New York,: Routledge.

View all 17 references / Add more references