Metaphilosophy 44 (4):533-556 (2013)

Anand Vaidya
San Jose State University
Should we always engage in critical thinking about issues of public policy, such as health care, gun control, and LGBT rights? Michael Huemer (2005) has argued for the claim that in some cases it is not epistemically responsible to engage in critical thinking on these issues. His argument is based on a reliabilist conception of the value of critical thinking. This article analyzes Huemer's argument against the epistemic responsibility of critical thinking by engaging it critically. It presents an alternative account of the value of critical thinking that is tied to the notion of forming and deploying a critical identity. And it develops an account of our epistemic responsibility to engage in critical thinking that is not dependent on reliability considerations alone. The primary purpose of the article is to provide critical thinking students, or those that wish to reflect on the value of critical thinking, with an opportunity to think metacritically about critical thinking by examining an argument that engages the question of whether it is epistemically responsible for one to engage in critical thinking
Keywords reliability  critical thinking  epistemic responsibility  moral expertise  debating public policy  critical identities
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/meta.12047
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Expertise and the Credentials Problem.Michael Cholbi - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):323-334.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Dialogical Logic.Laurent Keiff - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #140,105 of 2,507,565 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,263 of 2,507,565 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes