Public Deliberation and the Inclusion of Future Generations

Jurisprudence 6 (3):496-515 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Climate change could be described as an unstructured policy problem, in which we encounter disagreement on facts and values, problem definition, policy aims, procedures and instruments. For the solution of this type of problem public deliberation is often proposed. According to theories of deliberative democracy all those potentially affected by a decision should have the opportunity to participate in the drafting of that decision. However, in the context of climate change many of the potentially affected cannot speak for themselves, because they do not yet exist. Could future generations nevertheless be represented in public deliberations? And if so, who could legitimately represent them? Moreover, how could such representation get shape institutionally within a deliberative democracy? I will examine some obstacles––in particular the non-identity and the pluralism problems––that have to be overcome before future generations can be represented and question how deliberative democracy could deal with these..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Theoria and Praxis of Obligations to Future Generations.Rex Charles Peebles - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship.Dennis F. Thompson - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):17-37.
Democracy, deliberation and disobedience.William Smith - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.
Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2012 - Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
Climate change, intergenerational equity and the social discount rate.Simon Caney - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4):320-342.
Conservation, foresight, and the future generations problem.Steve Vanderheiden - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):337 – 352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-03

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.Daniel Sarewitz - 2004 - Environmental Science and Policy 7 (5):385-403.
Inequality, Ecojustice and Ecological Rationality.Val Plumwood - 1998 - Social Philosophy Today 13:75-114.
Inequality, Ecojustice and Ecological Rationality.Val Plumwood - 1998 - Social Philosophy Today 13:75-114.

Add more references