Reply to `social cost and Groves mechanisms'

Economic Notes 31:173-176 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my 1992 paper in Economic Notes, I argued that the traditional heuristic interpretation of taxes in the pivotal mechanism (in terms of the utility loss imposed by the taxed individual on the rest of society) is not correct, since it takes into account only the effect that the individual has on the decision concerning the project and disregards the effect that the same individual has on the taxes paid by the other members of society. Campbell criticizes my observation on two grounds

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social contracts and corporations: A reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
Social mechanisms and causal inference.Daniel Steel - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):55-78.
Reply to Daniel steel's "with or without mechanisms".Erik Weber - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):267-270.
The uneasy case for capital taxation.Edward J. McCaffery - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):166-184.
Theory of mind and other domain-specific hypotheses.C. M. Heyes - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1143-1145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#533,027)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giacomo Bonanno
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.

Add more references