Authors
Jonathan Seglow
Royal Holloway University of London
Abstract
Philosophy & Social Criticism, Volume 48, Issue 4, Page 515-529, May 2022. Much of the recent literature on freedom of speech has focused on the arguments for and against the regulation of certain kinds of speech. Discussions of hate speech and offensive speech, for example, abound in this literature, as do debates concerning the permissibility of pornography. Less attention has been paid, however, at least recently, to the normative foundations of freedom of speech where three classic justifications still prevail, based on the values of truth, autonomy and democracy. In this paper we argue, first, that none of these justifications meet all four intuitive desiderata for an adequate theory of free speech. We go on to sketch an original relational view of free speech, one which grounds its value in the recognition that speakers grant each other when engaging in speech practices, and its limits in the republican ideal of non-dominated co-exercisable liberty. We briefly illustrate the relational approach’s implications for the debate on hate speech regulation and for the response to fake news.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/01914537211073782
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - Duckworth.
A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.Regina Rini - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):43-64.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom of Speech: A Relational Defence.Matteo Bonotti & Jonathan Seglow - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (4):515-529.
A Defence of Free Speech.Richard McDonough - 1989 - In Cedric Pan Jaganathan Muraleenathan (ed.), Thinking about Democracy. pp. 61-84.
Freedom of Speech in Liberal and Non-Liberal Traditions.Volker Kaul - 2022 - Sage Publications Ltd: Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (4):460-472.
Academic Freedom: Its Nature, Extent and Value.Robin Barrow - 2009 - British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (2):178-190.
Self-Respect, Domination and Religiously Offensive Speech.Matteo Bonotti & Jonathan Seglow - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):589-605.
Freedom of Speech and Philosophy of Education.Roy Harris - 2009 - British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (2):111-126.
Freedom of Communication.Tom Campbell & Wojciech Sadurski - 1994 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Freedom of Speech : Why Freedom of Speech Includes Hate Speech.Daniel Jacobson - 2007 - In Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
What Cannot Be Said: The Path of Silence.James Crosswhite & June Manuel - 2022 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 55 (1):47-52.
Freedom of Speech in Liberal and Non-Liberal Traditions.Volker Kaul - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (4):460-472.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-04-23

Total views
7 ( #1,068,093 of 2,507,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,797 of 2,507,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes