Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (4):460-472 (2022)

The article presents different theories and comparative analyses of freedom of speech in both liberal and non-liberal traditions. Whereas freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the question is if this right should depend wholly on the truth of the respective opinion or statement. Theories that justify free speech on the grounds of autonomy, tend to make truth a moral requirement of speech. Theories based on civility and public reason do restrict freedom of speech even further, often making a form of recognition a precondition of free speech. This reveals to be particularly relevant in multicultural contexts and discussions about blasphemy. From this overview of contemporary, global comparative debates on free speech, the article draws some conclusions. First, there should be the absolute primacy of free speech regarding governments and the powerful: Speak truth to power. Second, free speech should underlie no constraints where important individual rights are at stake. Third, academic freedom has a special status and should not be subject to the same limits as freedom of expression more generally. Forth, in civil society and the public sphere a more moderate approach to free speech should be adopted based on civility, public reason and recognition. Yet, any limits should be of moral and not legal nature.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/01914537221095285
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1859 - Broadview Press.
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1956 - Broadview Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Concepts of “Liberal Education”.Stefan Lorenz Sorgner - 2004 - [email protected] - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 3 (2):107-119.
Republican Freedom and the Rule of Law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
Liberalism or Immigration Restrictions, But Not Both.Javier Hidalgo & Christopher Freiman - 2016 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 10 (2):1-22.
No Platforming.Robert Mark Simpson & Amia Srinivasan - 2018 - In Jennifer Lackey (ed.), Academic Freedom. Oxford, UK: pp. 186-209.
Liberal and Republican Freedom.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2009 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4):418-439.
Liberalism's Divide, After Socialism and Before.Jacob T. Levy - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (1):278-297.
Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
A Perfectionist Defense of Free Speech.J. Miles - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (2):213-230.
Free Speech and Liberal Community.Gerald Lang - 2019 - In Carl Fox & Joe Saunders (eds.), Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy. London, UK: pp. 105-123.
Spinoza’s Liberalism.Matthew J. Kisner - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (11):782-793.
Freedom as Independence.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - Ethics 126 (4):1043–1074.
The Levellers and the Birth of Liberal Political Economy.James R. Otteson - 2020 - Social Philosophy and Policy 37 (1):170-189.
Free Speech in the American Founding and in Modern Liberalism.Thomas G. West - 2004 - Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2):310-384.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #1,009,999 of 2,517,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #100,823 of 2,517,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes