Intuitionistic Logic according to Dijkstra's Calculus of Equational Deduction

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (4):361-384 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dijkstra and Scholten have proposed a formalization of classical predicate logic on a novel deductive system as an alternative to Hilbert's style of proof and Gentzen's deductive systems. In this context we call it CED (Calculus of Equational Deduction). This deductive method promotes logical equivalence over implication and shows that there are easy ways to prove predicate formulas without the introduction of hypotheses or metamathematical tools such as the deduction theorem. Moreover, syntactic considerations (in Dijkstra's words, "letting the symbols do the work") have led to the "calculational style," an impressive array of techniques for elegant proof constructions. In this paper, we formalize intuitionistic predicate logic according to CED with similar success. In this system (I-CED), we prove Leibniz's principle for intuitionistic logic and also prove that any (intuitionistic) valid formula of predicate logic can be proved in I-CED

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)

6 months
43 (#97,437)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

On calculational proofs.Vladimir Lifschitz - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 113 (1-3):207-224.

Add more references