Why the acrimony?: Reply to Davidson

&
Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):407-421 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our response to Davidson is two‐pronged. First, we dispute the basis for his dismissal of Austrian economics as presented by O'Driscoll and Rizzo. In particular, we reject his claim, dictated entirely by his Post Keynesian perspective, concerning an “identical axiomatic foundation” of Austrian and neoclassical economics. Second, we seek to show that Davidson's criticism of neoclassicism is based on a superficial, incorrect, and outmoded reading of neoclassical economics.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/08913819308443308

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why the acrimony? Reply to Davidson.Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):407-421.
The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.
>What can Austrian economists learn from the post Keynesians? Reply to Davidson.Christopher Torr - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):399-406.
What can Austrian economists learn from the post Keynesians?: Reply to Davidson.Christopher Torr - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):399-406.
After Davidson, who needs the Austrians? Reply to Davidson.David L. Prychitko - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):371-380.
A radical interpretation of Davidson: Reply to Alvarez.Hans-Johann Glock - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):206-212.
Austrians and Post Keynesians on economic reality: Rejoinder to critics.Paul Davidson - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):423-444.
Davidson's identity crisis.Daniel D. Hum - 1998 - Dialectica 52 (1):45-61.
Davidson’s Identity Crisis.Daniel D. Hutto - 1998 - Dialectica 52 (1):45-61.
Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson responding to an international forum of philosophers.Ralf Stoecker (ed.) - 1993 - New York: W. de Gruyter.
Are all actions movements of the agent's body?Julian Fink - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):52-64.
What Davidson Should Have Said.Ernest LePore & Barry Loewer - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):65-78.
Tarski, Davidson, and Theories of Truth.David Larson - 1988 - Dialectica 42 (1):3-16.
Reply to Patrick Suppes.Donald Davidson - 1985 - In Bruce Vermazen & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events. Oxford University Press. pp. 247--52.
Reply to Harry Lewis.Donald Davidson - 1985 - In Bruce Vermazen & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events. Oxford University Press. pp. 242--244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
4 (#1,619,050)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.
No Title available: Reviews.Bruce J. Caldwell - 1986 - Economics and Philosophy 2 (1):141-147.

Add more references