Philosophical Quarterly 11 (42):1-9 (1961)

Abstract
Why does aristotle say that the common sensibles are susceptible to error while the specific sensibles are not? various solutions of this problem are discussed and finally it is concluded that aristotle's meaning here is teleological. The specific senses were fashioned by nature to perceive the specific sensibles but not the common sensibles and so error sometimes (often) creeps in. The common sense is really not a sense faculty as the eye, The ear etc
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2216674
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

De Anima II 5.Myles F. Burnyeat - 2002 - Phronesis 47 (1):28-90.
Aristotle's Theory of Abstraction.Allan Bäck - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz's Account of Error.Keya Maitra - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):63 – 73.
The Problem of Perception.Tim Crane - 2005 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Perception.Howard Robinson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Aristotle on Perception.Stephen Everson - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Aristotle on the Sense Organs (Review). [REVIEW]J. A. Towey - 1999 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 119:192-193.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
122 ( #95,887 of 2,507,378 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,378 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes