Incidental emotions have a greater impact on the logicality of less proficient reasoners

Thinking and Reasoning 23 (1):98-113 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Previous research shows differences in reasoning about emotional and neutral stimuli. A common explanation hypothesised for this effect is that emotion incurs an additional cognitive load. If this is the case, incidental emotion should have a greater impact on the reasoning of less proficient reasoners, and when items are more difficult, because a greater proportion of available cognitive resources must be allocated to the task. We manipulated the emotional value of reasoning stimuli using conditioning and with the simultaneous presentation of images. The deleterious effect of emotion on logicality was greater for less proficient reasoners. There was also some indication that the effect of emotion may be more pronounced for more difficult items. Physiological responses and affective evaluations of the stimuli were similar across groups, irrespective of reasoning proficiency. Results provide some support for the hypothesis that the impact of emotion occurs through increased cognitive load.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotion and action.Jing Zhu & Paul Thagard - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (1):19 – 36.
Emotion: Something More Than Feelings.Allyson Lee Robichaud - 1997 - Dissertation, City University of New York
The Cognitive Emotions and Emotional Cognitions.Iris M. Yob - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):43-57.
Standing up for an affective account of emotion.Demian Whiting - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):261-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-15

Downloads
26 (#524,350)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?