Responsible research: What is expected? Commentary on: “Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials”

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Responsible research” and “good science” are concepts with various meanings depending on one’s perspective and assumptions. Fellow researchers, research participants, policy makers and the general public also have differing expectations of the benefits of research ranging from accurate and reliable data that extend the body of knowledge, to solutions to societal concerns. Unless these differing constituencies articulate their differing views they may fail to communicate and undermine the value of research to society

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Responsible Research: What is Expected?: Commentary on: “Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials”.Stephanie J. Bird - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696.
The Research Misconception.Maurie Markman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.
Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials.Sara H. Vollmer & George Howard - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):675-691.
Using empirical data to inform the ethical evaluation of placebo controlled trials.Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):29-35.
Statistics and ethics in medical research.David L. DeMets - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):97-117.
A clinical trials manual from the Duke Clinical Research Institute: lessons from a horse named Jim.Margaret B. Liu - 2010 - Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Kate Davis & Margaret B. Liu.
Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data.Joe Giffels, Sara H. Vollmer & Stephanie J. Bird - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
Disputing the ethics of research: The challenge from bioethics and patient activism to the interpretation of the declaration of helsinki in clinical trials.Simon Woods & Pauline Mccormack - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (5):243-250.
End of Life Pediatric Research: What About the Ethics? [REVIEW]Danielle Laudy - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):87-91.
Overseeing Innovative Therapy without Mistaking It for Research: A Function-Based Model Based on Old Truths, New Capacities, and Lessons from Stem Cells.Patrick L. Taylor - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):286-302.
Informed consent in emergency research: A contradiction in terms.Malcolm G. Booth - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Benefits to research subjects in international trials: Do they reduce exploitation or increase undue inducement?Angela Ballantyne - 2006 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):178-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-13

Downloads
26 (#607,778)

6 months
2 (#1,186,462)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references