Responsible Research: What is Expected?: Commentary on: “Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials”

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Responsible research and good science are concepts with various meanings depending on one’s perspective and assumptions. Fellow researchers, research participants, policy makers and the general public also have differing expectations of the benefits of research ranging from accurate and reliable data that extend the body of knowledge, to solutions to societal concerns. Unless these differing constituencies articulate their differing views they may fail to communicate and undermine the value of research to society

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Responsible research: What is expected? Commentary on: “Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials”.Stephanie J. Bird - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696.
Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data.Joe Giffels, Sara H. Vollmer & Stephanie J. Bird - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
Group mentoring to Foster the responsible conduct of research.Caroline Whitebeck - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):541-558.
Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research.Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
Four observations about “six domains of research ethics”.Edward J. Hackett - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
Research ethics, research integrity and the responsible conduct of research.Stephanie J. Bird - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):411-412.
Moving Forward with the Concept of Responsible Leadership: Three Caveats to Guide Theory and Research. [REVIEW]David A. Waldman - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):75-83.
Setting Up Spaces for Collaboration in Industry Between Researchers from the Natural and Social Sciences.Steven M. Flipse, Maarten C. A. van der Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):7-22.
Observations on the Responsible Development and Use of Computational Models and Simulations.David J. Kijowski, Harry Dankowicz & Michael C. Loui - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):63-81.
Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism.Ronald M. Atlas - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):293-301.
The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What? [REVIEW]Katherine Alfredo & Hillary Hart - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):447-457.
Responsible Leadership: Pathways to the Future. [REVIEW]Nicola M. Pless & Thomas Maak - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):3-13.
Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct.Stephanie J. Bird - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):455-468.
Making a Difference or Making a Statement? Finance Research and Socially Responsible Investment.Pietra Rivoli - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):271-287.
Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors.Sara R. Jordan & Phillip W. Gray - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):297 - 314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-22

Downloads
34 (#443,903)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references