Scientific Progress: A Study concerning the Nature of the Relation between Successive Scientific Theories by Craig Dilworth; Scientific Revolutions by Ian Hacking [Book Review]

Isis 74:258-259 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/353252

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Scientific progress: a study concerning the nature of the relation between successive scientific theories.Craig Dilworth - 1981 - Hingham, MA, U.S.A.: Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Academic.
Scientific progress: a study concerning the nature of the relation between successive scientific theories.Craig Dilworth - 1981 - Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Craig Dilworth: Scientific progress. A study concerning the nature of the relation between successive scientific theories. Craig Dilworth: The metaphysics of science. An account of modern science in terms of principles, laws and theories. [REVIEW]Hanne Andersen - 1997 - Erkenntnis 47 (2):265-271.
Incommensurability and Scientific Progress: An Essay Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories.Craig William James Dilworth - 1977 - Dissertation, Carleton University (Canada)
C. Dilworth, "Scientific Progress. A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation between Successive Scientific Theories". [REVIEW]P. A. Rossi - 1982 - Epistemologia 5 (1):186.
DILWORTH, C.: "Scientific Progress: A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories". [REVIEW]R. Phillips - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61:213.
On the nature of the relation between successive scientific theories.Craig Dilworth - 1978 - Epistemologia 1 (1):43.
Scientific Progress: A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation between Successive Scientific Theory. [REVIEW]Richard J. Blackwell - 1983 - Modern Schoolman 61 (1):59-59.
Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions: Rorty’s Failure at Redescribing Scientific Progress.Kyle Cavagnini - 2012 - Stance 5 (1):31-43.
The Gestalt Model of Scientific Progress in Scientific Knowledge Socialized.Craig Dilworth - 1988 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:299-311.
Progress in Scientific Revolutions: The Problem of Semantic Incommensurability.John Donald Collier - 1984 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Scientific Progress.Craig Dilworth - 1992 - Noûs 26 (2):264-270.
Scientific progress without increasing verisimilitude: In response to Niiniluoto.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:100-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
11 (#1,133,540)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references