- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Social Conditions for Nanomedicine: Disruption, Systems, and Lock-in
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):733-740 (2006)
Abstract
Here we consider two ways that nanomedicine might be disruptive. First, low-end disruptions that are intrinsically unpredictable but limited in scope, and second, high end disruptions that involve broader societal issues but can be anticipated, allowing opportunity for ethical reflectionAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Social Conditions for Nanomedicine: Disruption, Systems, and Lock-In.Robert Best & George Khushf - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):733-740.
The Ethics of Disruptive Technologies: Towards a General Framework.Jeroen Hopster - forthcoming - In J. F. de Paz Santana & D. H. de la Iglesia (eds.), New Trends in Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence.
A Portrait of Nanomedicine and Its Bioethical Implications.Rebecca M. Hall, Tong Sun & Mauro Ferrari - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):763-779.
Responsible Conduct in Nanomedicine Research: Environmental Concerns Beyond the Common Rule.David B. Resnik - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):848-855.
Ethical issues in nanomedicine: Tempest in a teapot?Irit Allon, Ahmi Ben-Yehudah, Raz Dekel, Jan-Helge Solbakk, Klaus-Michael Weltring & Gil Siegal - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):3-11.
Bridging the Knowledge Gap: Examining Potential Limits in Nanomedicine.Jaipreet Virdi - 2008 - Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):25.
The Impact of Nanomedicine Development on North–South Equity and Equal Opportunities in Healthcare.Michael G. Tyshenko - 2009 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 3 (3).
Medicine.Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore - 2009 - In Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin & Daniel Moore (eds.), What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter: From Science to Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 215–229.
Freitas on Disease in Nanomedicine: Implications for Ethics. [REVIEW]Vassiliki L. Leontis & George J. Agich - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):205-214.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-31
Downloads
24 (#155,087)
6 months
4 (#1,635,958)
2010-08-31
Downloads
24 (#155,087)
6 months
4 (#1,635,958)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Regulating nanomedicine—the smallest of our concerns?Roger Brownsword - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):73-86.
Public Value Mapping of Equity in Emerging Nanomedicine.Catherine P. Slade - 2011 - Minerva 49 (1):71-86.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo