Meta-Incommensurability between Theories of Meaning: Chemical Evidence

Perspectives on Science 23 (3):361-378 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Attempting to compare scientific theories requires a philosophical model of meaning. Yet different scientific theories have at times—particularly in early chemistry—pre-supposed disparate theories of meaning. When two theories of meaning are incommensurable, we must say that the scientific theories that rely upon them are meta-incommensurable. Meta- incommensurability is a more profound sceptical threat to science since, unlike first-order incommensurability, it implies complete incomparability.

Similar books and articles

Multisemiosis and Incommensurability.S. K. Arun Murthi - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):297-311.
Multisemiosis and Incommensurability.S. K. Arun Murthi & Sundar Sarukkai - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):297-311.
Is There an Incommensurability between Superseding Theories? On the Validity of the Incommensurability Thesis.A. Polikarov - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):127 - 146.
Are there rival, incommensurable theories?Dale W. Moberg - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):244-262.
Is there an incommensurability between superseding theories?A. Polikarov - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):127 - 146.
Kuhn on Incommensurability and Theory Choice.Alex Davies - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):571-579.
Reference, ontological replacement and Neo-Kantianism: a reply to Sankey.Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Eric Oberheim - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):203-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-17

Downloads
1,536 (#7,402)

6 months
209 (#15,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?