What was revolutionary about the Chemical Revolution?

In Eric Scerri & Grant Fisher (eds.), Essays in Philosophy of Chemistry. Oxford University Press. pp. 37-59 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lavoisier and his allies should be regarded as philosophers of chemistry, for they took it upon themselves to carry out a scientific revolution. Inspired by enlightenment philosophy, they introduced new assumptions, apparatus and methods of experimentation. They provided a linguistic framework that would ensure These reforms, as much as any theoretical changes, are what make this period revolutionary. Moreover, by reading these scientists as philosophers of chemistry, we see that the Chemical Revolution was in many ways more revolutionary than Thomas Kuhn and other philosophers of science portray it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
From phlogiston to caloric: chemical ontologies. [REVIEW]Mi Gyung Kim - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (3):201-222.
The Rhetoric of “Revolution” Dismantled: The Case of Communist Propaganda.Stefan Sebastian Maftei - 2005 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 4 (10):166-181.
The Moral Reality of Revolution.Courtney Scott Campbell - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Virginia

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-25

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references