Abstracts of Some Lectures Perception

Philosophy 1 (1):78 (1926)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The words “mind” and “matter” are used glibly, both by ordinary people and by philosophers, without any adequate attempt at definition. Philosophers are much to blame for this. My own feeling is that there is not a sharp line, but a difference of degree; an oyster is less mental than a man, but not wholly un-mental. And I think “ mental ” is a character, like “ harmonious ” or “ complicated,” that cannot belong to a single entity, but only to a system of entities. But before defending this view, I wish to spend some time on traditional theories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-awareness and mental perception.Hisayasu Kobayashi - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):233-245.
Matter and Memory.Henri Bergson - 1912 - Mineola, N.Y.: MIT Press. Edited by Paul, Nancy Margaret, [From Old Catalog], Palmer & William Scott.
Split brains and single minds.James Baillie - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:11-18.
The senses linking mind and matter.Magni Martens & H. Martens - 2008 - Mind and Matter 6 (1):51-86.
Matter and form in the science of kabbalah.Michael R. Kellogg - 2006 - World Futures 62 (4):338 – 342.
Theory-Theory and the Direct Perception of Mental States.Jane Suilin Lavelle - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2):213-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
22 (#702,999)

6 months
1 (#1,472,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references