Antonyms and Paradoxes

Argumentation 17 (1):113-122 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Adjectives can be gradable or non-gradable and this aspect of their meaning is responsible for their different distribution and also for their classification into two different classes of antonyms. Non-gradable antonyms are called contradictories: they are neither true nor false together and exclude any middle term; gradable antonyms are called contraries: they are not simultaneously true, but may be simultaneously false. While with contraries a negative disjunction (neque...neque) can define an intermediate level, with contradictories it simply means that either term of the disjunction is excluded. There are however some Latin examples, such as neque vivus neque mortuus (`neither alive nor dead'), where the negation of a contradictory pair is used to convey a third, intermediate value. This third possibility is precisely what gives place to a paradox. Such an intermediate level can be defined also by terms like semivivus, semianimis (`half-dead'). Following Ducrot's theory on argumentation, such terms represent an argumentative attenuation, not with respect to life, rather with respect to death. With contradictories, in fact, the use of semi-, like the use of negation, gives the assertion of the opposite term as a result

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logical, Semantic and Cultural Paradoxes.Anna Orlandini - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):65-86.
The square of opposition and the paradoxes.Teresa Marques - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):87-105.
DegP scope revisited.Sigrid Beck - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (3):227-272.
Gradable adjectives: A defence of pluralism.Keith DeRose - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):141-160.
Is the Liar sentence both true and false?Hartry Field - 2005 - In J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflationism and Paradox. Clarendon Press.
MUSings on Functional Disorders.Stephen Tyreman - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (4):301-303.
Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning.L. A. Zadeh - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):407-428.
Symmetry and Paradox.Stephen Read - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):307-318.
Dialetheism and the Graphic Liar.Greg Littmann - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):15-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
81 (#205,800)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

L'argumentation dans la langue.Jean-Claude Anscombre & Oswald Ducrot - 1984 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 174 (1):111-112.
Degree Words.Dwight Bolinger - 1976 - Foundations of Language 14 (3):377-398.

Add more references