Why Is There a Discussion of False Belief in the Theaetetus?

Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):171-199 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The "Theaetetus" on How We Think.David Barton - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (3):163 - 180.
The Theaetetus on how we Think.David Barton - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (3):163-180.
Why is there a discussion of false belief in the.Hugh H. Benson - 1992 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):171-199.
False Belief in the "Theaetetus".Gail Fine - 1979 - Phronesis 24 (1):70 - 80.
Referential opacity and false belief in the theaetetus.C. J. F. Williams - 1972 - Philosophical Quarterly 22 (89):289-302.
The Case of Theaetetus.Gokhan Adalier - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (1):1 - 37.
The Case of Theaetetus.Gokhan Adalier - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (1):1-37.
Infallibilism and Gettier’s Legacy.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):304 - 327.
Why not LF for false belief reasoning?Jill G. de Villiers & Peter A. de Villiers - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):682-683.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-28

Downloads
54 (#295,373)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Benson
University of Oklahoma

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references