Why is there a discussion of false belief in the

Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):171-199 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1353/hph.1992.0023

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Naughty beliefs.Andrew Huddleston - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):209-222.
Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind.Paul Bloom - 2000 - Cognition 77 (1):25-31.
Why not LF for false belief reasoning?Jill G. de Villiers & Peter A. de Villiers - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):682-683.
Linguistic Practice and False-belief Tasks.Matthew Van Cleave - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (3):298-328.
How we can agree to disagree.John Collins - unknown
Report.Richard Griffin - unknown
Linguistic practice and false-belief tasks.Matthew van Cleave & Christopher Gauker - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (3):298-328.
Is there a right to be wrong?David S. Oderberg - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):517-537.
Infallibilism and Gettier’s Legacy.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):304 - 327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#548,167)

6 months
4 (#776,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Benson
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references