Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit

Ethics and International Affairs 20 (2):143-169 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines how consensus was reached on the "responsibility to protect," given continuing hostility to humanitarian intervention expressed by many of the world's states and whether the consensus will contribute to avoiding future Kosovos and Rwandas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion, Violence, and Human Rights.James Turner Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):1-14.
Who should pay for humanitarian intervention?Fredrik D. Hjorthen - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (3):334-353.
The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention.Don E. Scheid (ed.) - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Legitimacy, humanitarian intervention, and international institutions.Miles Kahler - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
38 (#100,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Humanitarian Intervention and International Law: The Moral Importance of an Intervener’s Legal Status.James Pattison - 2007 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (3):301-319.
Religion, Violence, and Human Rights.James Turner Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):1-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references