Uncertainty about the value of quantum probability for cognitive modeling

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):279-280 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the overly simplistic scenarios discussed by Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) establish at best that quantum probability theory (QPT) is a logical possibility allowing distinct predictions from classical probability theory (CPT). The article fails, however, to provide convincing evidence for the proposal that QPT offers unique insights regarding cognition and the nature of human rationality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Betting on the outcomes of measurements: A bayesian theory of quantum probability.Itamar Pitowsky - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):395-414.
Perspectives on Modeling in Cognitive Science.Richard M. Shiffrin - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):736-750.
Probability concepts in quantum mechanics.Patrick Suppes - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (4):378-389.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
25 (#633,195)

6 months
4 (#790,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christina Behme
Mount Saint Vincent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references