'Was-must be' and 'is-ought' in Hume

Philosophical Studies 26 (3-4):219 - 228 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00398880

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How to be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism.John Greco - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
Hume = small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
David Hume and eighteenth-century America.Mark G. Spencer - 2005 - Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Was Hume a Humean?Elijah Millgram - 1995 - Hume Studies 21 (1):75-94.
Hume on morality.James Baillie - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
The Pursuits of Philosophy: An Introduction to the Life and Thought of David Hume.Annette C. Baier - 2011 - Harvard University Press.
C. S. Lewis’s Critique of Hume’s “on Miracles”.Robert Larmer - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):154-171.
Essays on Kant and Hume.Lewis White Beck - 1978 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#197,793)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Two dogmas of metaethics.P. Bloomfield - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (3):439-466.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references